Tuesday, April 24, 2007

Qualities of SS Teachers

Hi people -- I've just posted "Qualities of SS Teachers" on my blog, http://www.thoughtsonsocialstudies.blogspot.com/. If u r free or interested, go take a peek n share what u feel about the qualities that we're supposed to possess. Thanks! :) moses

Sunday, April 22, 2007

How did the study of SS originate in Singapore?

Now in Singapore, education is the primary instrument that is used for nation building. The nation building policies have focused on maintaining equal opportunities for the people regardless of racial or religious background as well as to ensure that peace and stability are prevalent for strong economic development (Social Studies Textbook). However, it was revealed that younger Singaporeans’ tended to take this peace and prosperity for granted as they lacked the knowledge and interest in their country’s history and nation- building issues. This gave rise to government concern.
"This ignorance will hinder our effort to develop a shared sense of nationhood. We will not acquire the right instincts to bond together as one nation, or maintain the will to survive and prosper in an uncertain world. For Singapore to thrive beyond the founder generation, we must systematically transmit these instincts and attitudes to succeeding cohorts." (Lee, 1997)
Through the teaching of SS, Mr Lee’s concern can be addressed. In other words, as social studies teachers we play a pivotal role in imparting knowledge, values and traditions and in particular about cultural heritage, patriotism, ideals of political traditions to our students. We are the “curricular –instructional gatekeepers” that determine students’ access to knowledge and bind their opportunities to learn. Therefore, within the formal educational system, a co-ordinated and sustained effort could therefore be made to transmit relevant knowledge, desirable values as well as to shape attitudes and behaviours.

The Social Studies Teacher I want to be

This is just an informal entry...

I want to be the social studies teacher that makes students realize and develop their potentials to be critical and creative thinkers and most importantly, to assure them that their inputs matter! That they are the stakeholders who can contribute to the social studies classes to make them more interesting and purposeful... In order for me to achieve that,

  • I must not think of my students as passive recipients of knowledge. They have the tendency to communicate, inquire, construct and express (Westbrook, 1993) and I will ensure that the lessons are designed to promote these predispositions.
  • My lessons should infuse their personal experiences and interests with the subject matters. Such that they become more meaningful for the students as they assimilate new information with their prior knowledge or schema.
  • They should be made to participate in decision- making and problem- solving of various issues. (Often, it is when we're faced with a problem that we become critical and creative in thinking in order to get out of the fix! )
  • I will walk through the processes of thinking and constructing knowledge with them not as teacher but as a learner. I will learn from them and likewise share with them my experiences and strategies. Together, we will be able to contribute to a rich learning environment that respects individual differences and promotes intense discussion of ideas.

But I know that this will be a challenging task... I will need lots of planning, patience, determination, flexibility etc... Will I be able to do it???

I don't know... But I will try and try and try and try… and with every try, I hope... I will get closer to being 'the effective social studies teacher ' that I want to be. =)


"The obstacles you face are... mental barriers which can be broken by adopting a more positive approach."

-Clarence Blasier-

Defence and Deterrence

The recent Virginia Tech massacre has thrown up the gun-rights issue in the US of A. Gun ownership is seen as a constitutional (known as "Second Amendment") right. I reckon there are many reasons why Bush cannot push for stricter gun control. Like my tutor in another module said, he is a Texan, after all. Like any good ol' fashioned cowboy, he ain't gonna give up his gun. Probably folks up in rural states feel the same. Gun culture runs deep in American folklore, with the John Waynes and Dirty Harrys.

The Second Amendment reads: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." (from Wiki)

Some of the arguments from gun rights activists are quite interesting; if guns were allowed in schools, and in particulary Va. Tech, the victims could have used them to stop the shooter, Cho. Wow. So, kill him before he kills you. Kill or be killed.

Ted Nugent, a rock guitarist writes on CNN.com: "Evil is as evil does, and laws disarming guaranteed victims [of gun violence] make evil people very, very happy. Shame on us."

In the topic of Defence and Deterrence (which surfaces in Chapter 6), what if our students were to draw parallels between this sort of justification and the need for an armed force for a country? What if a student starts to advocate gun rights in Singapore? I think we have to make a differentiation, and make it clear that the security of a country, within a geographical space is very different from carrying guns to school. When individuals (in a personal basis) are allowed to carry weapons or take up arms, chances are a madman will crop up somewhere and start shooting people. However, there are probably many checks in place in an army to detect and eradicate potential madmen. But does this mean the Americans have got it wrong? I can detect some of us who may think, "The solution is so obvious! Why can't they just ban guns, like what we did?!" Even Aussie PM called for US to revisit the gun rights issue, in the wake of the massacre.

Then again, no system is perfect. I may be wrong. Please feel free to shoot your views here.

Wednesday, April 18, 2007

It's (not) about the ewe-bee-dee

A couple of things Mark talked about today in class:

- Marx's Dialetical Materialism
- Movie: Half Nelson (starring the very yummy Ryan Gosling! Heh.)

And I'll leave you with his quote:
“The more we email, the more prozac we need.” - some dude, IHT.

Monday, April 16, 2007

Blogs and Discussion Forums

Well, just to expand on what I mentioned in class this morning. In my conception of using blogs as a teaching tool, the teacher will be the only author of the blog and students are unable to create new posts but are encouraged to post comments. I don't think that students should be allowed to create new posts (like what we are doing in this forum) because of the mess that it will cause.

In blogs, with each new post, the previous post gets pushed down, and keeping our students' mentality in mind, I would expect quite a bit of irrelevant stuff flooding the blog if we allow them to create new posts. As blogs are meant as learning tools, if the blog is flooded, then it will not be achieving its aim. Thus, if only the teacher has the power to create new posts, s/he will be able to ensure that only interesting posts are up on the blog. Students will be encouraged to respond to these posts. In this sense, the teacher is the gatekeeper, restricting discussions to what is felt to be relevant. But I should state that I do not mean that teachers should always be the gatekeepers; it is just that blogs require the existence of a gatekeeper to maintain orderliness and achieve its goal of being a learning tool.

Online forums, on the other hand, are much better suited for in-depth discussions, interaction, negotiation and collaboration. Online forums are structured into three different levels: General Areas (Eg: Chit-Chat, Politics), followed by Thread Titles (Eg: Will Henry be leaving Arsenal?, Should Ministerial Salaries be Raised?), and then the Threads themselves. In this sense, online forums have a higher tolerance for disorder and thus it can afford to have all students creating new threads. The teacher can post stuff for serious discussions in a General Area and assign another General Area for light-hearted discussions.

So I guess my point is, using blogs or online forums depend on the purpose of the teacher. If the teacher intends to provide information to students, then using a blog will be better as it is more focused than a online forum. On the other hand, online forums provide more opportunities for student interaction since they get to discuss about non-class-related stuff. Of course, it is less focused.

There are pros and cons to both tools but personally, I will go with online forums rather than blogs.

Race and racism

Since we were talking about dealing with 'race' in class today, I thought I could share something. I am not sure how many of you have heard of Jane Elliot and the "Blue Eye-Brown Eye" experiment she did. In response to the assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr. over thirty years ago, Elliott (a teacher in Riceville, Iowa) devised the "Blue Eyes/Brown Eyes" exercise for her class of 3rd grade students. This exercise labels participants as inferior or superior based solely upon the color of their eyes and exposes them to the experience of being a minority. It was shocking and radical. How useful can it be in a Singapore classroom? You can find the link under "Links" (thanks, Ally!)

What are the relationships between social studies education and society?

One of the main goals of social studies is to get students to become reflective citizens and critically analyse issues instead of blindly accepting them. This characteristic is getting more and more sought after in society today, both in schools and at work. Therefore, this marks a strong relationship between SS and society as the skills students picked up can be applied to the work force and at higher educational level. One example would be when I was studying in NUS. We were expected to critically analysis and evaluate certain issues and write out a paper on it. The same is expected in the work force where bosses don't just expect workers to blindly follow the rest but rather, expects them to be reflective about their work and seel to improve upon it rather than doing them without understanding why. Social studies education and society are thus, very much interrlinked as the skills which students picked up can definitely be applied in society.
I thought this point can also be linked to another SS goal of preparing students for the changing world. As Singaporeans begin to venture out into the global market, they need to critically reflect what they are seeing and reading in order for them to succeed in the competitive world.

What it means to teach Social Studies

From our very first session, we discovered the multitude of definitions of Social Studies. While Social Studies encompasses diverse fields like history, geography, sociology and even economics and the political sciences, all the descriptions converged on one focal point: people. Why is this subject named as such? Simply because it is the analysis of people, their ways of life, and their community. Lifestyle is a very broad term that encapsulates everything from cultures to values. With that in mind, in the teaching of SS, students not only learn facts and figures, they are also taught how to live, in a sense. Ultimately, SS is about the education of effective citizens.


Brain malfunctioning, so dunno what I'm writing. Tsk tsk tsk...

Sunday, April 15, 2007

The type of SS teacher I hope to be

Warning: this is really a super informal post.. more like a diary.

anyway.. here goes..

I would like to share my experience during my contract teaching.

When I first took over three Sec 3 Normal (Academic) classes for SS, I foresaw a big obstacle before me – students’ disinterest in the subject. For the ‘worst’ class, I walked in and was treated as invisible. The students were busy playing games that test their physique and physics; for the ‘best’ class, students sitting at the front rows were interested, while those at the back were busy doing work from other subjects. Then I heard stories from my ‘middle’ class about the relief teacher who took them (for quite a few months) before I did. According to ‘sources’, this teacher loved to “shriek and scream” at them. She would carry “big bags” with her everywhere she go, and wear low cut blouses when “no one is interested at all”. She would bring in the lap-top, “tried in vain to connect it to the projector”, and then “ended up playing games herself on her laptop”.

Oh yes, and before I took over, a colleague had told me to be prepared that the students “have been conditioned that SS lesson = do nothing”.

Looks like the stories from my students may be, perhaps, exaggerated, but they do carry some truth in it.

And I did hear that relief teacher speak before; her voice indeed is rather high-pitched.

Before I met my classes, I had envisioned myself to be a thought-provoking teacher, just like how my NUS professors have been. After all, part of SS is about developing reflective citizens, isn’t it? While preparing for the lesson on conflicts in Sri Lanka, I had even wanted them to think about citizenship rights in Singapore, whether everyone is treated equal. But after the first few encounters, I knew I had to change my mindset.

So, every time I took these classes, I made sure I was in full armor. I knew I would need lots of patience, and lots of creative ideas to get them interested in the subject.

So in came the controversial political cartoons, and I even let them watch “Brotherhood” (self-censored, since it’s M18. I am still wondering if I had violated copy rights law by mass-screening it). It worked. They were finally paying attention; they finally looked forward to my lesson and my presence. It was a pity, however, that I didn’t have the time to engage them more in critical thinking and evaluation of the movie.

I still hold on to my faith of wanting to become a thought-provoking SS teacher. I want to make students be more sensitive and reflective towards things around them, especially those taken-for-granted. I want to be the Devil’s advocate.

However, before that, I would want to be the patient and caring teacher who works with students, who responds to their needs. I want to be humane. After all, SS is about people and society, right?

And students’ comments keep me going.

“Cher, you make me want to study SS.”

“Cher, I hope you can teach us next year.”

That’s the type of social studies teacher I want to be.

Flabbergasting FHM Girls

Courtesy of Junhao... who claims he got the link via tomorrow.sg

http://youth.sg/blog/2007/04/13/will-it-soon-be-no-work-days

Can you say, abominable?

*shakes head*

Use/value of using blogs in teaching/learning SS

First and foremost, blogs are the ‘in-thing’ now, especially among teenagers. We have to be mindful that we are working with the IT-natives here. Thus, as a platform that is familiar and of interest to them, I believe there is some practical value in using blogs to teach SS. We need to make them interested in something first before we can engage them in it.

Next, blogs allow the 'publishing' and sharing of ideas. It thus encourages student-centred learning. Students interact with their peers, negotiate issues and so, they collaborate together to construct their own unique understanding.

Further, because blogs are open to be viewed by others, students will have to bear the responsibility of any consequences that may be brought about by their entries. In the process, we engage them in personal development.

The way students interact in their blogs can also serve as a source to be examined. It tells about the relationship between people in our society, how language is used, the issues that they are concerned with etc.

Goals of SS

B. What do you see as the main (or most important) goal and purpose of social studies education in Singapore? How will this guide your unit and lesson planning?

The most important goal in teaching Social Studies is to get the students to be critical thinkers. As Mrs Chan mentioned, she told her class that she wants them to be politically sensitive gobal citizens with Singapore as home. I agree with this. So being critical will be set against this backdrop. Students must learn to question sources. Question questions. With this in mind, materials and sources must be carefully chosen, lesson plans must be judiciously crafted - learner-centred approaches etc. We have to carry out the lesson in a way they wouldn't deem it as National Education, but in the same way that can send these messages across.

Value of blogs in SS

Here's one of the questions posed:

Do you see any use or value, whatsoever, in using blogs in teaching and learning Social Studies? Explain.

Okay, here goes - I feel that blogs provide students with a multitude of perspectives on a certain issue. And since the very nature of blogs tends to provide links to other like-minded bloggers, chances are, students will be able to read up on other perspectives. This could be good for source-based learning since a variety of opinions can be accessed easily, and students can make informed decisions about the issue. The danger though, is that it is merely a representation of someone's perspective and may not be the authority on a subject matter. So, if we want to get the facts, I'd say, stick to the old school methods and go bury your head in a journal or textbook.

Welcome

Hellooooo folks... Hear ye, hear ye!

The Dutch Queen welcomes one and all to the inaugural SS group blog. Let's post away and kick the blogosphere's ass while we're at it. ;)